Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-27 06:51:11 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

El vuelo al que hace mención el artículo sí aterrizó en Tulum y no "se perdió". Por un banco de niebla fue necesario aterrizar primero en Mérida. https://aristeguinoticias.com/2612/mexico/aterriza-primer-vuelo-de-mexicana-en-tulum-tras-desvio-en-merida/

Written by 8E287C3A96DA926C01132AA1E9207CF3C499DF5E947D175923F55E9BB47101B8
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1739684644218376678

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1739901722712060148
  • noteId - 1739901722712060148
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8E287C3A96DA926C01132AA1E9207CF3C499DF5E947D175923F55E9BB47101B8 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1703659871167
  • tweetId - 1739684644218376678
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • El vuelo al que hace mención el artículo sí aterrizó en Tulum y no "se perdió". Por un banco de niebla fue necesario aterrizar primero en Mérida. https://aristeguinoticias.com/2612/mexico/aterriza-primer-vuelo-de-mexicana-en-tulum-tras-desvio-en-merida/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-27 06:51:11 UTC
(1703659871167)
2023-12-27 17:56:47 UTC
(1703699807490)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-12-28 01:04:44 UTC
(1703725484400)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-12-27 17:56:47 UTC
(1703699807490)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-27 16:34:53 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 15:41:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 14:55:58 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 14:24:52 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 13:31:17 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 12:27:40 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 12:09:20 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 12:09:13 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 11:41:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 10:50:07 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 10:49:20 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 10:28:49 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 10:25:49 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 10:01:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 09:41:25 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 09:40:58 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 08:11:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 01:19:26 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 00:59:44 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-28 10:44:56 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-04 10:02:20 -0600 Rating Details