Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-26 09:25:49 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Do read the article; it is not bad. Authors do not propose the population reduction at all. They are contemplating possible sustainable alternatives to the constant GDP growth as the only model for prosper society. Merry Christmas! https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-04412-x

Written by D57B9607CA64D372E825D48B6611A1AF24042E3EF4D15CA8655211DF9F6ED006
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1739480643577196561

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1739578250534203601
  • noteId - 1739578250534203601
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - D57B9607CA64D372E825D48B6611A1AF24042E3EF4D15CA8655211DF9F6ED006 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1703582749389
  • tweetId - 1739480643577196561
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Do read the article; it is not bad. Authors do not propose the population reduction at all. They are contemplating possible sustainable alternatives to the constant GDP growth as the only model for prosper society. Merry Christmas! https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-04412-x

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-26 09:25:49 UTC
(1703582749389)
2023-12-27 00:15:05 UTC
(1703636105889)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-12-27 01:06:34 UTC
(1703639194551)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-12-27 00:15:05 UTC
(1703636105889)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-26 16:29:08 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 14:15:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 12:36:34 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 12:11:15 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 11:49:02 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 11:01:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 10:02:46 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 09:40:51 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 09:30:33 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 09:30:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 09:16:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 08:51:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 08:41:37 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 08:17:40 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 08:12:19 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 07:52:35 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 07:42:19 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 07:06:33 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 06:43:17 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 05:54:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 04:58:40 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 04:48:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 04:32:25 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 04:22:34 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 04:19:41 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 04:03:01 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 04:03:00 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 03:53:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 03:45:46 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 03:30:03 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 09:28:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 07:42:55 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 01:13:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 01:00:27 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 22:54:16 -0600 Rating Details