Birdwatch Note
2023-12-26 09:01:03 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There is no evidence nor any credible claims that Russia has ever used chemical weapons in Syria. Documented investigations from the OPCW’s FFM, JIM and IIT teams have blamed Syria, ISIS and Syrian rebels for using CWs, but never Russia. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_of_chemical_weapons_in_the_Syrian_civil_war
Written by 8A97D85979CB295BBB7D210ECAFE60D88CD8D1FE2F79FF93B7D2A5D53AFEFE37
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1739374530320126451
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1739572018792509767
- noteId - 1739572018792509767
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8A97D85979CB295BBB7D210ECAFE60D88CD8D1FE2F79FF93B7D2A5D53AFEFE37 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1703581263628
- tweetId - 1739374530320126451
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There is no evidence nor any credible claims that Russia has ever used chemical weapons in Syria. Documented investigations from the OPCW’s FFM, JIM and IIT teams have blamed Syria, ISIS and Syrian rebels for using CWs, but never Russia. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_of_chemical_weapons_in_the_Syrian_civil_war
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-26 09:01:03 UTC (1703581263628) |
2023-12-26 12:57:13 UTC (1703595433058) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2023-12-27 01:06:34 UTC (1703639194551) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2023-12-26 12:57:13 UTC (1703595433058) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-12-26 11:18:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-26 09:54:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-26 09:04:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-26 08:59:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-26 08:11:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-26 06:52:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-26 06:36:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-26 06:06:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-26 05:16:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-26 04:30:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-26 04:09:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-26 03:45:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-26 03:19:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-26 03:02:40 -0600 | Rating Details |