Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-25 00:24:55 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. OP states an opinion that an Ukrainian defeat would be a blow to credibility of NATO, given the sheer amount of political and military aid both in CN links and https://www.state.gov/u-s-security-cooperation-with-ukraine/ its not a misleading point. If the opinion is correct or not should be discussed in replies.

Written by C46427E99840AB92177F871420AA0C8016F2A4033EF0C759B393D9F0B51C6846
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1738675634895806545

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1739079742471434482
  • noteId - 1739079742471434482
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - C46427E99840AB92177F871420AA0C8016F2A4033EF0C759B393D9F0B51C6846 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1703463895803
  • tweetId - 1738675634895806545
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN. OP states an opinion that an Ukrainian defeat would be a blow to credibility of NATO, given the sheer amount of political and military aid both in CN links and https://www.state.gov/u-s-security-cooperation-with-ukraine/ its not a misleading point. If the opinion is correct or not should be discussed in replies.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-25 00:24:55 UTC
(1703463895803)
2023-12-25 18:58:44 UTC
(1703530724693)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-12-26 02:01:21 UTC
(1703556081666)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-12-25 18:58:44 UTC
(1703530724693)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-25 13:38:30 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-25 12:47:19 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-25 11:12:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-25 11:08:21 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-25 11:06:10 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-25 11:06:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-25 10:48:54 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-25 10:42:10 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-25 07:36:40 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-25 07:17:10 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-25 03:30:45 -0600 Rating Details