Birdwatch Note
2023-12-24 12:32:53 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Cette image date de 2015. A l’époque la gendarmerie disait qu’il s’agissait de « jeunes du secteur » sans procédé à des arrestations et que les tags avaient été inscrits pour se venger d’un retraité. https://www.larep.fr/saint-martin-sur-ocre-45500/actualites/saint-martin-sur-ocre-se-reveille-a-nouveau-couvert-de-tags_11721972/
Written by EB57F407D3B6D58921734DAD80B8323107818A9062BC65E097DA1C50F9C01173
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1738461173450691039
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1738900551608189020
- noteId - 1738900551608189020
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - EB57F407D3B6D58921734DAD80B8323107818A9062BC65E097DA1C50F9C01173 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1703421173368
- tweetId - 1738461173450691039
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Cette image date de 2015. A l’époque la gendarmerie disait qu’il s’agissait de « jeunes du secteur » sans procédé à des arrestations et que les tags avaient été inscrits pour se venger d’un retraité. https://www.larep.fr/saint-martin-sur-ocre-45500/actualites/saint-martin-sur-ocre-se-reveille-a-nouveau-couvert-de-tags_11721972/
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-12-24 12:32:53 UTC (1703421173368) |
2023-12-24 18:00:38 UTC (1703440838056) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-12-25 01:06:32 UTC (1703466392031) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-12-24 18:00:38 UTC (1703440838056) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-12-24 17:20:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-24 16:12:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-24 15:51:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-24 15:26:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-24 14:22:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-24 12:08:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-24 10:10:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-24 09:48:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-24 07:38:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-24 07:35:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-24 07:26:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-24 07:19:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-24 07:14:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-25 05:51:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-25 03:13:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-25 00:34:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-24 18:57:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-26 02:45:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-24 14:30:01 -0600 | Rating Details |