Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-23 22:13:56 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Being able to name historical figures is not a measure of IQ. Fake internet IQ tests are common, and this is clearly one of them. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/nov/29/iq-tests-online-are-they-valid

Written by E8A18728EF35643EF65FD70FB86B747CD6464B5EAA0E06DAE5AB43347FE8BE71
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1737306927170769086

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1738684391063212101
  • noteId - 1738684391063212101
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - E8A18728EF35643EF65FD70FB86B747CD6464B5EAA0E06DAE5AB43347FE8BE71 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1703369636681
  • tweetId - 1737306927170769086
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Being able to name historical figures is not a measure of IQ. Fake internet IQ tests are common, and this is clearly one of them. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/nov/29/iq-tests-online-are-they-valid

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-23 22:13:56 UTC
(1703369636681)
2023-12-24 00:54:47 UTC
(1703379287431)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-12-24 02:00:17 UTC
(1703383217195)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-12-24 00:54:47 UTC
(1703379287431)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-23 18:58:36 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-23 18:41:00 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-23 18:05:21 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-23 17:34:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-23 16:36:52 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-23 16:34:21 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-24 10:41:00 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-24 09:06:49 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-24 08:09:28 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-24 07:46:40 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-24 06:48:47 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-24 03:45:23 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-24 00:56:19 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-23 22:25:39 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-23 21:26:19 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-23 21:14:03 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-23 20:58:15 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-23 20:19:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-23 19:49:40 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-23 19:38:24 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-25 09:04:15 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-25 05:08:21 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-25 02:52:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 13:19:17 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 02:32:24 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-25 23:58:46 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 16:21:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 07:22:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-27 06:12:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-24 08:03:28 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-25 09:50:11 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-02 14:37:10 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-01 19:28:09 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-24 18:19:19 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-03 08:27:22 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-03 02:58:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-26 06:48:02 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-04 09:06:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-24 08:28:35 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-01 16:34:50 -0600 Rating Details