Birdwatch Note
2023-12-22 10:38:29 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Barristers are not permitted to reject clients on the basis of finding the client or their cause offensive or unpopular. The ‘cab rank’ rule means barristers must take on cases within their competence if they are at the front of the queue. https://www.barcouncil.org.uk/resource/cab-rank-rule-statement-of-the-four-bars.html
Written by C13C4CE4350AADDC64C980AB5039AA80E9493B98059A7518CE8F99D6CDD9A398
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1737922355849011607
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1738146987185209824
- noteId - 1738146987185209824
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C13C4CE4350AADDC64C980AB5039AA80E9493B98059A7518CE8F99D6CDD9A398 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1703241509614
- tweetId - 1737922355849011607
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Barristers are not permitted to reject clients on the basis of finding the client or their cause offensive or unpopular. The ‘cab rank’ rule means barristers must take on cases within their competence if they are at the front of the queue. https://www.barcouncil.org.uk/resource/cab-rank-rule-statement-of-the-four-bars.html
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-22 10:38:29 UTC (1703241509614) |
2023-12-22 22:08:08 UTC (1703282888911) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-12-23 01:03:10 UTC (1703293390949) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-12-22 22:08:08 UTC (1703282888911) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-12-22 13:37:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-22 12:25:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-22 05:29:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-22 05:26:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 14:22:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-22 22:43:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-22 20:27:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-24 13:49:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-24 12:29:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-24 08:03:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-24 04:02:13 -0600 | Rating Details |