Birdwatch Note
2023-12-20 00:55:06 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Contrairement à ce qu'avance Darmanin, les votes du RN ont permis l'adoption de cette loi. En effet, sans les 88 députés RN la loi n'aurait pas atteint la majorité absolue qui était de 268. Le résultat aurait été de 261 POUR (349-88) et 274 CONTRE (186+88) 1. https://www2.assemblee-nationale.fr/scrutins/detail/(legislature)/16/(num)/3213 2.https://twitter.com/2022Elections/status/1737244513972715952?t=B3_EkTN3izb4Mrdp3L0Mbg&s=19
Written by E54BA4B965859C9F5B3A16D3CCBDF1B37F01DCE00E802079D7C4BCD86DB4F889
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1737239320283484646
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1737275398226890959
- noteId - 1737275398226890959
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E54BA4B965859C9F5B3A16D3CCBDF1B37F01DCE00E802079D7C4BCD86DB4F889 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1703033706611
- tweetId - 1737239320283484646
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Contrairement à ce qu'avance Darmanin, les votes du RN ont permis l'adoption de cette loi. En effet, sans les 88 députés RN la loi n'aurait pas atteint la majorité absolue qui était de 268. Le résultat aurait été de 261 POUR (349-88) et 274 CONTRE (186+88) 1. https://www2.assemblee-nationale.fr/scrutins/detail/(legislature)/16/(num)/3213 2.https://twitter.com/2022Elections/status/1737244513972715952?t=B3_EkTN3izb4Mrdp3L0Mbg&s=19
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-20 00:55:06 UTC (1703033706611) |
2023-12-20 08:03:51 UTC (1703059431404) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-12-21 01:05:44 UTC (1703120744319) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 2023-12-20 08:03:51 UTC (1703059431404) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-12-20 15:11:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 14:54:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 11:01:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 10:49:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 10:37:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 10:18:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 09:55:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 09:18:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 08:34:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 05:42:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 05:00:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 04:55:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 04:52:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 04:44:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 03:42:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 03:40:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 03:24:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 02:46:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 02:30:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 02:24:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 01:27:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 01:25:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 01:15:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 01:12:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 01:12:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 01:10:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 00:39:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 00:34:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 00:19:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 00:19:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 00:16:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 00:14:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-19 23:41:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-19 23:23:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-19 23:21:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-19 22:55:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-19 19:53:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-19 18:57:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-21 07:06:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-20 03:24:09 -0600 | Rating Details |