Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-15 19:02:00 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The original tweet is accurate regarding the Holy Trinity v. United States case; no correction is needed. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/143/457/ The CN is informative, but the 1905 judge's book reference is extraneous and irrelevant to the tweet. For accurate context, refer to the case itself rather than the book.

Written by 2676F1D09B2658DBDEEF4D34FCD1B338A90EB57E5851BAA425CEC3AD70687E28
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1734683665760960846

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1735736984423796904
  • noteId - 1735736984423796904
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 2676F1D09B2658DBDEEF4D34FCD1B338A90EB57E5851BAA425CEC3AD70687E28 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1702666920178
  • tweetId - 1734683665760960846
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The original tweet is accurate regarding the Holy Trinity v. United States case; no correction is needed. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/143/457/ The CN is informative, but the 1905 judge's book reference is extraneous and irrelevant to the tweet. For accurate context, refer to the case itself rather than the book.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-15 19:02:00 UTC
(1702666920178)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-12-16 01:04:31 UTC
(1702688671776)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-15 14:49:37 -0600 Rating Details