Birdwatch Note
2023-12-15 18:30:24 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This is not a medical study and thus has not been peer reviewed Sciencedirect is owned by a Dutch publishing company and does not do medical research The data was taken from the files of one hospital and did not use the scientific method to form a conclusion https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2052297523001075 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ScienceDirect https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elsevier https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
Written by 98199E99A8D7037240383318492A52AE67600271AB62CDB70912294DB69403B5
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1735725999512338542
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1735729032602271856
- noteId - 1735729032602271856
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 98199E99A8D7037240383318492A52AE67600271AB62CDB70912294DB69403B5 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1702665024316
- tweetId - 1735725999512338542
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This is not a medical study and thus has not been peer reviewed Sciencedirect is owned by a Dutch publishing company and does not do medical research The data was taken from the files of one hospital and did not use the scientific method to form a conclusion https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2052297523001075 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ScienceDirect https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elsevier https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-12-15 18:30:24 UTC (1702665024316) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-16 01:04:31 UTC (1702688671776) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-12-15 16:51:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-15 15:00:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-15 14:48:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-15 14:28:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-15 14:20:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-15 13:05:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-15 12:51:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-16 11:11:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-15 23:15:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-16 21:41:38 -0600 | Rating Details |