Birdwatch Note
2023-12-15 17:11:47 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The case in question was Duke of Sussex v Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) which is not connected to Rupert Murdoch who owns MGN’s rival, News UK. https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/the-duke-of-sussex-and-others-v-mgn-limited/ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_UK The post also claims the Prince of Wales settled a separate case which is unconfirmed speculation
Written by 6BB193A4FAE29698A5221BD4C942046A831767BA4CDA91000A587B08F767F8D0
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1735656880238649785
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1735709247558554044
- noteId - 1735709247558554044
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 6BB193A4FAE29698A5221BD4C942046A831767BA4CDA91000A587B08F767F8D0 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1702660307190
- tweetId - 1735656880238649785
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The case in question was Duke of Sussex v Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) which is not connected to Rupert Murdoch who owns MGN’s rival, News UK. https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/the-duke-of-sussex-and-others-v-mgn-limited/ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_UK The post also claims the Prince of Wales settled a separate case which is unconfirmed speculation
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-15 17:11:47 UTC (1702660307190) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-16 01:04:31 UTC (1702688671776) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-12-15 15:13:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-15 14:12:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-15 13:45:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-15 13:11:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-15 12:52:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-15 11:55:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-16 07:43:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-17 01:36:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-17 00:12:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-22 02:22:41 -0500 | Rating Details |