Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-14 14:07:54 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This is digitally altered, and the author admits it in the first comment. At what point do we stop writing repetitive CNs? How many identical notes do we need? There should be a way that we can just agree with a note and be credited based on that information. See above 👆 https://t.co/nSXYjq5NER

Written by 1E01DBFC840502B506BA424EDCFE94A1B52464207AB5EE386269F455DCE3A89C
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1733643110935081204

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1735300586256380137
  • noteId - 1735300586256380137
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 1E01DBFC840502B506BA424EDCFE94A1B52464207AB5EE386269F455DCE3A89C Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1702562874750
  • tweetId - 1733643110935081204
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 1
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 1
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This is digitally altered, and the author admits it in the first comment. At what point do we stop writing repetitive CNs? How many identical notes do we need? There should be a way that we can just agree with a note and be credited based on that information. See above 👆 https://t.co/nSXYjq5NER

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-14 14:07:54 UTC
(1702562874750)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-12-15 04:52:34 UTC
(1702615954772)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-14 08:14:01 -0600 Rating Details