Birdwatch Note
2023-12-14 01:05:22 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The UKSC, the highest court in the UK, not foreign, struck down the plan following a decision from the ECtHR, of which it has Statutory Authority under the HRA 1998 s.2. Critically, though, this was only part of the reasoning, given in the Judgment of R (AAA) v SoS for HD. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/section/2 https://www.supremecourt.uk/about/index.html https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2023-0093.html
Written by BE5C07442000A3F6EF0A66AFD6A96828F6B39B30E081FA485CDB48DDAF31B54F
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1734659954877870425
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1735103655643099312
- noteId - 1735103655643099312
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - BE5C07442000A3F6EF0A66AFD6A96828F6B39B30E081FA485CDB48DDAF31B54F Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1702515922829
- tweetId - 1734659954877870425
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The UKSC, the highest court in the UK, not foreign, struck down the plan following a decision from the ECtHR, of which it has Statutory Authority under the HRA 1998 s.2. Critically, though, this was only part of the reasoning, given in the Judgment of R (AAA) v SoS for HD. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/section/2 https://www.supremecourt.uk/about/index.html https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2023-0093.html
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-14 01:05:22 UTC (1702515922829) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-15 04:52:34 UTC (1702615954772) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-12-14 08:03:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-14 03:56:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-14 00:50:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-13 23:51:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-13 23:01:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-13 20:34:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-15 14:09:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-15 05:49:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-03 03:29:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-03 06:41:14 -0600 | Rating Details |