Birdwatch Note
2023-12-13 11:16:07 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Selon l'interprétation courante de l'article 226-15 du code pénal, il semble que la divulgation de discussion privée soit bel et bien illégale sans le consentement de tous les partis. Sources : - https://www.annuaireavocats.fr/articles/publier-ou-partager-une-conversation-dune-application-ou-des-reseaux-sociaux-un-delit - https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000042193573#:~:text=Version%20en%20vigueur%20depuis%20le%2001%20ao%C3%BBt%202020,-Modifi%C3%A9%20par%20LOI&text=Le%20fait%2C%20commis%20de%20mauvaise,45%20000%20euros%20d'amende. Voir aussi articles 226-1 à 226-7 : - https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/section_lc/LEGITEXT000006070719/LEGISCTA000006149831/#LEGISCTA000006149831
Written by 2F992629D38AB440F44F1B5CFD623CA76C87BDF76D0F882A7D9E54F187056474
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1734848552080138727
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1734894968626348449
- noteId - 1734894968626348449
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 2F992629D38AB440F44F1B5CFD623CA76C87BDF76D0F882A7D9E54F187056474 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1702466167965
- tweetId - 1734848552080138727
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Selon l'interprétation courante de l'article 226-15 du code pénal, il semble que la divulgation de discussion privée soit bel et bien illégale sans le consentement de tous les partis. Sources : - https://www.annuaireavocats.fr/articles/publier-ou-partager-une-conversation-dune-application-ou-des-reseaux-sociaux-un-delit - https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000042193573#:~:text=Version%20en%20vigueur%20depuis%20le%2001%20ao%C3%BBt%202020,-Modifi%C3%A9%20par%20LOI&text=Le%20fait%2C%20commis%20de%20mauvaise,45%20000%20euros%20d'amende. Voir aussi articles 226-1 à 226-7 : - https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/section_lc/LEGITEXT000006070719/LEGISCTA000006149831/#LEGISCTA000006149831
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-13 11:16:07 UTC (1702466167965) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-14 04:36:49 UTC (1702528609705) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |