Birdwatch Note
2023-12-12 22:48:23 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. Clearly satirical, as was the original tweet which suggested note falsely claims was a "bait".
Written by AE06F5BB28DE294F99834DA55BD138DB09791E2C8005BE0C768DEF21F41810ED
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1734255566225027474
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1734706791529988346
- noteId - 1734706791529988346
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - AE06F5BB28DE294F99834DA55BD138DB09791E2C8005BE0C768DEF21F41810ED Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1702421303050
- tweetId - 1734255566225027474
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. Clearly satirical, as was the original tweet which suggested note falsely claims was a "bait".
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-12 22:48:23 UTC (1702421303050) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-13 03:28:16 UTC (1702438096692) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |