Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-12 18:25:44 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Es wird der Eindruck (in Überschrift, Text und Bild) erweckt, B. "gönne sich" eine Luxus Immobilie. Gekauft 2021 vor ihrer Amtszeit B. verweigert "nur" den Verkauf, da keine Alternative zu finden. https://apollo-news.net/baerbock-will-luxusresidenz-in-bruessel-behalten-rechnungshof-attackiert-auswaertiges-amt/

Written by AA9A30718E13338C1EE5FC7E38A32C4C8237614EA3CD7D83DDB0FCB14F9F819F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1734528066578157767

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1734640696001180086
  • noteId - 1734640696001180086
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - AA9A30718E13338C1EE5FC7E38A32C4C8237614EA3CD7D83DDB0FCB14F9F819F Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1702405544647
  • tweetId - 1734528066578157767
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Es wird der Eindruck (in Überschrift, Text und Bild) erweckt, B. "gönne sich" eine Luxus Immobilie. Gekauft 2021 vor ihrer Amtszeit B. verweigert "nur" den Verkauf, da keine Alternative zu finden. https://apollo-news.net/baerbock-will-luxusresidenz-in-bruessel-behalten-rechnungshof-attackiert-auswaertiges-amt/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-12 18:25:44 UTC
(1702405544647)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-12-13 03:28:16 UTC
(1702438096692)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-12 16:07:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-12 15:42:58 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-12 15:34:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-12 15:26:44 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-12 15:26:37 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-12 15:03:53 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-12 14:02:40 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-12 13:51:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-12 13:49:46 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-12 12:52:01 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-12 12:50:40 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-13 08:21:23 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-13 06:12:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-13 05:10:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-13 05:01:14 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-13 00:26:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-13 00:11:15 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-13 00:02:02 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-12 23:53:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-12 23:10:16 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-12 19:07:29 -0600 Rating Details