Birdwatch Note
2023-12-12 09:30:18 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Read at https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection/article/association-between-face-mask-use-and-risk-of-sarscov2-infection-crosssectional-study/0525AD535D10FDCDF0C52603B50E7A1E It is based on self reported data, Table 2 shows that a many non-mask wearers did not test either. There is a quality issue with this study, which the authors acknowledge in their conclusions. Please see here for a systematic review of other studies https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2023.0133#d39632e1
Written by 4D21AECB6F4E15FEE944190B2F6FD34E4C9AAAA99A6FA0A741B278E536CDED44
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1734432867022000265
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1734505949518311509
- noteId - 1734505949518311509
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 4D21AECB6F4E15FEE944190B2F6FD34E4C9AAAA99A6FA0A741B278E536CDED44 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1702373418582
- tweetId - 1734432867022000265
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Read at https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection/article/association-between-face-mask-use-and-risk-of-sarscov2-infection-crosssectional-study/0525AD535D10FDCDF0C52603B50E7A1E It is based on self reported data, Table 2 shows that a many non-mask wearers did not test either. There is a quality issue with this study, which the authors acknowledge in their conclusions. Please see here for a systematic review of other studies https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2023.0133#d39632e1
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-12 09:30:18 UTC (1702373418582) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-13 03:28:16 UTC (1702438096692) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-12-12 16:22:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-12 15:29:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-12 06:56:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-12 06:12:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-12 04:42:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-12 04:13:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-12 04:10:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-12 03:56:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-12 03:44:38 -0600 | Rating Details |