Birdwatch Note
2023-12-12 00:04:44 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. The PCA didn't explicitly declare Scarborough Shoal as Philippine territory. Instead, it ruled that China unlawfully interfered with Philippine fishermen's traditional activities there, but the decision didn't settle sovereignty issues over the Shoal. https://thediplomat.com/2016/07/interview-the-south-china-sea-ruling/ https://www.uscc.gov/research/south-china-sea-arbitration-ruling-what-happened-and-whats-next https://docs.pca-cpa.org/2016/07/PH-CN-20160712-Press-Release-No-11-English.pdf
Written by 2676F1D09B2658DBDEEF4D34FCD1B338A90EB57E5851BAA425CEC3AD70687E28
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1733509668268388696
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1734363618559311992
- noteId - 1734363618559311992
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 2676F1D09B2658DBDEEF4D34FCD1B338A90EB57E5851BAA425CEC3AD70687E28 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1702339484240
- tweetId - 1733509668268388696
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN. The PCA didn't explicitly declare Scarborough Shoal as Philippine territory. Instead, it ruled that China unlawfully interfered with Philippine fishermen's traditional activities there, but the decision didn't settle sovereignty issues over the Shoal. https://thediplomat.com/2016/07/interview-the-south-china-sea-ruling/ https://www.uscc.gov/research/south-china-sea-arbitration-ruling-what-happened-and-whats-next https://docs.pca-cpa.org/2016/07/PH-CN-20160712-Press-Release-No-11-English.pdf
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-12 00:04:44 UTC (1702339484240) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-12 03:28:18 UTC (1702351698848) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-12-20 18:49:53 -0600 | Rating Details |