Birdwatch Note
2023-12-11 18:34:32 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The paper makes no suggestion that mRNA vaccines are either more toxic or less effective than the toxicity and effectiveness as empirically measured in the clinical studies for those vaccines. It does show a mechanism where the process could be improved in future products. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06800-3 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2034577
Written by A0055B8E2CB68051948D96C007CC57C520FB06F5F50B617C901EA403108ED531
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1734252459667636600
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1734280521507549630
- noteId - 1734280521507549630
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - A0055B8E2CB68051948D96C007CC57C520FB06F5F50B617C901EA403108ED531 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1702319672359
- tweetId - 1734252459667636600
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The paper makes no suggestion that mRNA vaccines are either more toxic or less effective than the toxicity and effectiveness as empirically measured in the clinical studies for those vaccines. It does show a mechanism where the process could be improved in future products. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06800-3 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2034577
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-11 18:34:32 UTC (1702319672359) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-12 03:28:18 UTC (1702351698848) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-12-11 17:52:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 16:52:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 15:30:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 15:21:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 15:12:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 14:20:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 14:01:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 13:58:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 13:57:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 13:44:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-12 10:03:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-12 00:29:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 20:58:44 -0600 | Rating Details |