Birdwatch Note
2023-12-11 10:30:12 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The claim for Huangyan Island or Scarborough Shoal is disputed. In 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration ruled in favor of the Philippines and concluded that there is "no legal basis for China to claim historic rights" with more than 40 countries supporting the ruling. https://web.archive.org/web/20180209060419/https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/07/15/south-china-sea-arbitration/ https://amti.csis.org/arbitration-support-tracker/
Written by 3687F04C3B6B8AD3E24D16649742658453F9D16BAE1AE236FC95E0EF38851B84
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1733807011182362790
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1734158633691382026
- noteId - 1734158633691382026
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 3687F04C3B6B8AD3E24D16649742658453F9D16BAE1AE236FC95E0EF38851B84 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1702290612039
- tweetId - 1733807011182362790
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The claim for Huangyan Island or Scarborough Shoal is disputed. In 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration ruled in favor of the Philippines and concluded that there is "no legal basis for China to claim historic rights" with more than 40 countries supporting the ruling. https://web.archive.org/web/20180209060419/https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/07/15/south-china-sea-arbitration/ https://amti.csis.org/arbitration-support-tracker/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-11 10:30:12 UTC (1702290612039) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-12 03:28:18 UTC (1702351698848) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-12-11 05:34:47 -0600 | Rating Details |