Birdwatch Note
2023-12-11 09:33:58 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - The post is clearly satire, albeit realistic given @bbc behavior in the past.
Written by B74ACF79861AED6952B9FBA6B518FC91A237BD86C3DFD293E99FC1ADDA9C0DB5
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1733866453852459349
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1734144485720834560
- noteId - 1734144485720834560
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - B74ACF79861AED6952B9FBA6B518FC91A237BD86C3DFD293E99FC1ADDA9C0DB5 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1702287238901
- tweetId - 1733866453852459349
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN - The post is clearly satire, albeit realistic given @bbc behavior in the past.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-11 09:33:58 UTC (1702287238901) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-12 03:28:18 UTC (1702351698848) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-12-11 06:23:18 -0600 | Rating Details |