Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-11 05:29:52 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The OP is correct. This is what the Harvard policies call an "Inadequate Paraphrase". "When you paraphrase, your task is to distill the source's ideas in your own words. It's not enough to change a few words here and there and leave the rest." Source: https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/what-constitutes-plagiarism-0

Written by 31D466C790895C2D5C6937190A9AA2B8D18ABD719053FE74A015AC69FA4FD219
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1733977126020481266

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1734083053931155491
  • noteId - 1734083053931155491
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 31D466C790895C2D5C6937190A9AA2B8D18ABD719053FE74A015AC69FA4FD219 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1702272592418
  • tweetId - 1733977126020481266
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The OP is correct. This is what the Harvard policies call an "Inadequate Paraphrase". "When you paraphrase, your task is to distill the source's ideas in your own words. It's not enough to change a few words here and there and leave the rest." Source: https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/what-constitutes-plagiarism-0

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-11 05:29:52 UTC
(1702272592418)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-12-12 03:28:18 UTC
(1702351698848)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-11 13:37:03 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 12:22:01 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 11:30:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 10:19:21 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 09:35:45 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 09:31:21 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 07:03:24 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 06:50:40 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 05:42:57 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 05:42:28 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 03:51:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 03:47:39 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 03:18:14 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 02:43:29 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 01:14:02 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 00:52:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 00:26:19 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 00:02:37 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 23:55:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 23:37:23 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-12 09:08:44 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-12 07:32:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-12 07:20:41 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 22:21:10 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 21:07:25 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 19:49:17 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 19:28:00 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-24 17:56:34 -0600 Rating Details