Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-11 03:57:45 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Elissa Silverman did not support defunding the police. She called for more officers to be added. When asked “Should D.C. employ more police officers than the current size of the force?” she responded yes. https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/10/20/dc-election-at-large-council-questions/

Written by EA68BF5E07732709FD4EB74EE7188B1B07C196FF539F035F8343052574EDAB38
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1734025589697261813

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1734059870721069385
  • noteId - 1734059870721069385
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - EA68BF5E07732709FD4EB74EE7188B1B07C196FF539F035F8343052574EDAB38 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1702267065110
  • tweetId - 1734025589697261813
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Elissa Silverman did not support defunding the police. She called for more officers to be added. When asked “Should D.C. employ more police officers than the current size of the force?” she responded yes. https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/10/20/dc-election-at-large-council-questions/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-11 03:57:45 UTC
(1702267065110)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-12-12 03:28:18 UTC
(1702351698848)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-11 14:21:47 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 22:20:15 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-12 10:51:01 -0600 Rating Details