Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-10 21:44:42 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The first note is a case for NNN, because Jason was being truthful. ``Jason's assertion that Jones did not answer his question is factually correct. Jones pivoted to "freedom of speech" but did avoid "what would you do differently" refer to the X Space as it was recorded.`` https://twitter.com/i/birdwatch/t/1733951502577025218

Written by 719C279E925A1FFA0427D68BF1243D9351E867D9E7169323BB5CBB9931DED11A
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1733951502577025218

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1733965990915154310
  • noteId - 1733965990915154310
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 719C279E925A1FFA0427D68BF1243D9351E867D9E7169323BB5CBB9931DED11A Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1702244682421
  • tweetId - 1733951502577025218
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The first note is a case for NNN, because Jason was being truthful. ``Jason's assertion that Jones did not answer his question is factually correct. Jones pivoted to "freedom of speech" but did avoid "what would you do differently" refer to the X Space as it was recorded.`` https://twitter.com/i/birdwatch/t/1733951502577025218

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-10 21:44:42 UTC
(1702244682421)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-12-11 03:17:03 UTC
(1702264623765)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-10 17:32:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 17:20:18 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 17:17:36 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 17:06:26 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 16:30:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 16:03:13 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 16:02:18 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 14:47:49 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 10:55:10 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 08:27:44 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 00:25:26 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 23:59:21 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 20:45:09 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 19:47:36 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-18 12:11:53 -0600 Rating Details