Birdwatch Note
2023-12-10 10:01:33 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
I know poeple that believe it could be the same. It's not misleading.
Written by 65B1F6F1BCFFFD35F7209890A650BACEB5E5CD92451AAB124C5CD95BBE4071C4
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1733598072171532432
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1733789036064502160
- noteId - 1733789036064502160
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 65B1F6F1BCFFFD35F7209890A650BACEB5E5CD92451AAB124C5CD95BBE4071C4 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1702202493100
- tweetId - 1733598072171532432
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- I know poeple that believe it could be the same. It's not misleading.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-12-10 10:01:33 UTC (1702202493100) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-11 03:17:03 UTC (1702264623765) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-12-10 12:22:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-10 05:38:09 -0600 | Rating Details |