Birdwatch Note
2023-12-10 07:52:53 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN the original poster isn’t accusing the person of gifting the AI generated images in place of bonus checks, it’s rather a hypothetical scenario he made up for the tweet.
Written by 8929DCB871A401F7B4822685F2D0E41924C699C8213DC265BF416A5BECEF4250
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1733705774352789776
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1733756658353074374
- noteId - 1733756658353074374
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8929DCB871A401F7B4822685F2D0E41924C699C8213DC265BF416A5BECEF4250 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1702194773649
- tweetId - 1733705774352789776
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN the original poster isn’t accusing the person of gifting the AI generated images in place of bonus checks, it’s rather a hypothetical scenario he made up for the tweet.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-12-10 07:52:53 UTC (1702194773649) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-11 03:17:03 UTC (1702264623765) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-12-10 16:45:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-10 15:32:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-10 11:51:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-10 08:21:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-10 07:50:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-10 06:34:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-10 06:23:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-10 06:19:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-10 05:50:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-10 05:37:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-10 05:12:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-10 04:14:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-10 03:56:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-10 02:33:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-11 07:44:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-10 22:25:46 -0600 | Rating Details |