Birdwatch Note
2023-12-09 20:05:07 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
That is a classic abuse of community notes. One can put that in a comment in the original tweet as it's echoing what the op said. https://x.com
Written by C9339E3851C55A7886B4552F6E392AF4B7A3F516FC1760760EC4A4A2115F714D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1733532152229195920
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1733578543752249660
- noteId - 1733578543752249660
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C9339E3851C55A7886B4552F6E392AF4B7A3F516FC1760760EC4A4A2115F714D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1702152307820
- tweetId - 1733532152229195920
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 1
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- That is a classic abuse of community notes. One can put that in a comment in the original tweet as it's echoing what the op said. https://x.com
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-12-09 20:05:07 UTC (1702152307820) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-10 03:45:05 UTC (1702179905692) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-12-09 16:02:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 16:00:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 14:56:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 14:41:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 14:35:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 14:10:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-10 07:42:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 21:20:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-12 08:36:03 -0600 | Rating Details |