Birdwatch Note
2023-12-09 19:24:28 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This guy is implying Ten Hag will get sacked soon. This is not true, and Ten Hag is fully backed by the board: https://www.tribalfootball.com/articles/romano-man-utd-board-fully-behind-ten-hag-4475360 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-12688085/amp/Erik-ten-Hag-backing-Man-United-board-Arnold-good-progress.html Twitter accounts and journalists use United defeats for clout on Twitter by over-dramatizing and sharing fake made up stories for engagement farming: https://www.pulsesports.co.ke/football/story/manchester-united-take-action-on-four-journalists-for-publishing-false-ten-hag-squad-fallout-2023120513051423572
Written by BCF9BDF85416ED276597A74C8988CABEC9D2C0CF270306B208F4101B6B35EA48
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1733525748218990914
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1733568312007676005
- noteId - 1733568312007676005
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - BCF9BDF85416ED276597A74C8988CABEC9D2C0CF270306B208F4101B6B35EA48 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1702149868383
- tweetId - 1733525748218990914
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This guy is implying Ten Hag will get sacked soon. This is not true, and Ten Hag is fully backed by the board: https://www.tribalfootball.com/articles/romano-man-utd-board-fully-behind-ten-hag-4475360 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-12688085/amp/Erik-ten-Hag-backing-Man-United-board-Arnold-good-progress.html Twitter accounts and journalists use United defeats for clout on Twitter by over-dramatizing and sharing fake made up stories for engagement farming: https://www.pulsesports.co.ke/football/story/manchester-united-take-action-on-four-journalists-for-publishing-false-ten-hag-squad-fallout-2023120513051423572
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-12-09 19:24:28 UTC (1702149868383) |
2023-12-09 23:14:31 UTC (1702163671202) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2023-12-10 03:45:05 UTC (1702179905692) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2023-12-09 23:14:31 UTC (1702163671202) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-12-09 18:29:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 17:59:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 17:09:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 16:59:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 16:48:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 16:45:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 16:41:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 16:24:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 15:54:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 15:53:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 15:51:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 15:46:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 15:31:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 15:26:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 15:05:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 14:13:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 14:08:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 13:54:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 13:51:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 13:45:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 13:40:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 13:32:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 13:29:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 13:29:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-10 14:04:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-10 10:43:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-10 10:11:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-10 06:23:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-10 06:03:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 22:30:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 21:42:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 19:40:14 -0600 | Rating Details |