Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-09 18:53:37 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This is fake information. Nicki Minaj never said so. The person who was commenting in the stationheads comments was someone impersonating nicki minaj with her profile picture. Here's a tweet explaining everything: https://twitter.com/KingSeanSwae/status/1733557932589982010?s=19

Written by BE8B9703FBAEBE9BA0BFB8DF602CE224C31C84FEDC91415EFD8E367112E31B54
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1733558611584942545

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1733560550338994487
  • noteId - 1733560550338994487
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - BE8B9703FBAEBE9BA0BFB8DF602CE224C31C84FEDC91415EFD8E367112E31B54 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1702148017858
  • tweetId - 1733558611584942545
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This is fake information. Nicki Minaj never said so. The person who was commenting in the stationheads comments was someone impersonating nicki minaj with her profile picture. Here's a tweet explaining everything: https://twitter.com/KingSeanSwae/status/1733557932589982010?s=19

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-09 18:53:37 UTC
(1702148017858)
2023-12-09 23:14:31 UTC
(1702163671202)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-12-10 03:45:05 UTC
(1702179905692)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-12-09 23:14:31 UTC
(1702163671202)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-09 16:36:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 16:10:41 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 16:02:34 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 15:18:58 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 14:22:51 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 14:15:53 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 14:13:56 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 13:59:29 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 13:57:58 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 13:52:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 13:25:09 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 13:23:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 13:13:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 13:04:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 13:00:09 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 12:58:53 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 12:56:26 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 11:54:09 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 10:11:08 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 09:52:40 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 05:06:27 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 02:39:27 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 20:59:54 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 20:37:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 20:12:01 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 05:18:53 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 04:13:16 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 10:13:18 -0600 Rating Details