Birdwatch Note
2023-12-09 16:02:46 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Liverpool have not, in fact, had every decision go their way. Had the VAR disaster against Spurs been correctly decided they would been top last week instead of this week. https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_/id/38622652/premier-league-var-liverpool-move-top-table-tottenham-third-place
Written by C9243DF8667E5894F5793E655EB5595DD7E07326631F8D78365C5BD34E46AC75
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1733496067092525486
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1733517551013904423
- noteId - 1733517551013904423
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C9243DF8667E5894F5793E655EB5595DD7E07326631F8D78365C5BD34E46AC75 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1702137766018
- tweetId - 1733496067092525486
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Liverpool have not, in fact, had every decision go their way. Had the VAR disaster against Spurs been correctly decided they would been top last week instead of this week. https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_/id/38622652/premier-league-var-liverpool-move-top-table-tottenham-third-place
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-09 16:02:46 UTC (1702137766018) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-10 03:45:05 UTC (1702179905692) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-12-09 16:12:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-09 15:40:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-09 13:13:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-09 12:33:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-09 12:01:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-09 11:57:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-09 11:29:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-09 10:39:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-09 10:38:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-09 10:08:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-09 10:07:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-10 01:00:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-09 19:04:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 18:17:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 17:34:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 17:33:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 16:19:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 16:18:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 15:52:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-24 07:55:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-24 03:57:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-24 03:52:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 22:19:12 -0600 | Rating Details |