Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-09 10:20:32 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

1. Das im Hauptpost angesprochene ribosomale Frameshifting geht laut Nature-Artikel auf die modifizierte mRNA im Impfstoff zurück, deshalb ist "modRNA" richtig. 2. Die Proteinproduktion wurde experimentell nachgewiesen, es handelt sich nicht um ein "theoretisches Problem". https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06800-3

Written by 242AE4608ABFC1B0E3FEB5DDF1CB0009EA682E86D6F53D6ECB9AD8A10492503D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1733390505730297997

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1733431428614873088
  • noteId - 1733431428614873088
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 242AE4608ABFC1B0E3FEB5DDF1CB0009EA682E86D6F53D6ECB9AD8A10492503D Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1702117232841
  • tweetId - 1733390505730297997
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • 1. Das im Hauptpost angesprochene ribosomale Frameshifting geht laut Nature-Artikel auf die modifizierte mRNA im Impfstoff zurück, deshalb ist "modRNA" richtig. 2. Die Proteinproduktion wurde experimentell nachgewiesen, es handelt sich nicht um ein "theoretisches Problem". https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06800-3

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-09 10:20:32 UTC
(1702117232841)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-12-10 03:45:05 UTC
(1702179905692)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-09 07:39:55 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 07:17:10 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 06:41:56 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 05:36:57 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 05:15:36 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 04:49:20 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 04:43:33 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 12:19:08 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 09:06:30 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 19:33:22 -0600 Rating Details