Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-09 03:28:44 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

There is good evidence that "transgenderism is an entirely invented concept with no basis in neuroscience, psychology or psychiatry. " https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/02/07/the-making-of-trans-children/ https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/feb/19/time-to-think-by-hannah-barnes-review-what-went-wrong-at-gids

Written by 9F6750DFC8DCCF900B67C8F26A51576888DE886BE94EA45FBF6C8D6DAD096CBC
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1732585789744120131

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1733327793306620374
  • noteId - 1733327793306620374
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 9F6750DFC8DCCF900B67C8F26A51576888DE886BE94EA45FBF6C8D6DAD096CBC Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1702092524256
  • tweetId - 1732585789744120131
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • There is good evidence that "transgenderism is an entirely invented concept with no basis in neuroscience, psychology or psychiatry. " https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/02/07/the-making-of-trans-children/ https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/feb/19/time-to-think-by-hannah-barnes-review-what-went-wrong-at-gids

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-09 03:28:44 UTC
(1702092524256)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-12-10 03:45:05 UTC
(1702179905692)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-09 12:25:53 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 09:42:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 05:13:00 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 03:57:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-08 21:59:33 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-08 21:52:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 11:06:02 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 08:20:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 09:11:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-13 12:06:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-18 04:54:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-21 18:21:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-22 02:43:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-21 19:07:02 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-31 16:15:58 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-31 03:33:21 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-02 12:52:50 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-11 14:34:19 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-20 04:29:43 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-13 17:24:26 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 23:18:21 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 02:38:03 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-01 00:29:54 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-17 07:04:32 -0600 Rating Details