Birdwatch Note
2023-12-08 03:57:53 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This is not the optimal way to pack 21 squares into a larger square. The actual best known solution involves taking up 21 of the positions in a 5x5 grid. https://erich-friedman.github.io/papers/squares/squares.html
Written by 60352CB5B7090EA349C941792E7F1C8E74077E68D36B065EE32D681F6FCAED9A
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1732945379514105952
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1732972742020935818
- noteId - 1732972742020935818
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 60352CB5B7090EA349C941792E7F1C8E74077E68D36B065EE32D681F6FCAED9A Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1702007873431
- tweetId - 1732945379514105952
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This is not the optimal way to pack 21 squares into a larger square. The actual best known solution involves taking up 21 of the positions in a 5x5 grid. https://erich-friedman.github.io/papers/squares/squares.html
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-12-08 03:57:53 UTC (1702007873431) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-09 03:24:29 UTC (1702092269635) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-12-08 17:15:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 14:55:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 13:55:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 13:49:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 13:18:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 12:53:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 12:36:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 10:48:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 07:54:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 07:21:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 05:21:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 05:15:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 04:07:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 03:10:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 03:07:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 03:07:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 02:18:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 01:16:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 01:08:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 01:07:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 00:58:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 00:54:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 00:26:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 00:23:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-07 23:57:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-07 23:17:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-07 23:07:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-07 22:13:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-07 22:13:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-07 22:08:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-08 18:40:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-26 04:26:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-04-15 10:48:43 -0500 | Rating Details |