Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-07 17:37:26 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The note claiming that "calls for violence" are not protected speech is flat wrong. As law professor Alan Dershowitz said just yesterday: "You can advocate, under the First Amendment, . . . 'we think that the Jews . . . should be exterminated.' That's protected speech." https://youtu.be/d60NwKbqIB8?t=752

Written by 5A6C7B5D9679186980B338862A743398083962C6B33A541242AB405D0AB8A7BF
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1732549608230862999

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1732816601655750928
  • noteId - 1732816601655750928
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 5A6C7B5D9679186980B338862A743398083962C6B33A541242AB405D0AB8A7BF Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1701970646664
  • tweetId - 1732549608230862999
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The note claiming that "calls for violence" are not protected speech is flat wrong. As law professor Alan Dershowitz said just yesterday: "You can advocate, under the First Amendment, . . . 'we think that the Jews . . . should be exterminated.' That's protected speech." https://youtu.be/d60NwKbqIB8?t=752

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-07 17:37:26 UTC
(1701970646664)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-12-08 03:04:43 UTC
(1702004683234)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-07 18:11:37 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 16:05:00 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 15:43:28 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 15:33:32 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 15:25:30 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 15:17:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 14:43:44 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 14:29:46 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 12:27:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 12:08:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 12:02:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 11:51:54 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 11:45:33 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-08 10:55:32 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-08 07:46:34 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-08 04:12:38 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-08 03:25:18 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-08 00:23:58 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 21:40:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 20:39:46 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 20:17:32 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 19:39:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 18:13:28 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 16:09:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 15:03:36 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 08:02:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 05:47:02 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-08 21:06:10 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 04:50:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 03:42:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-14 18:35:37 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-10 07:35:02 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-31 11:11:04 -0600 Rating Details