Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-07 14:59:59 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The study reports that 5 out of 21 subjects (24%) vaccinated with BNT162b2 had an immune reaction to the defective +1 shifted Spike protein (Fig 2d). This shows that a relevant number of persons are affected. No investigation into specific side effects was done. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06800-3

Written by A10A46C4BE8101EBAD9A35CAE31C997A64BAB0001CFF57D6DC024A6677918D93
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1732433678943338907

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1732776975884759196
  • noteId - 1732776975884759196
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - A10A46C4BE8101EBAD9A35CAE31C997A64BAB0001CFF57D6DC024A6677918D93 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1701961199147
  • tweetId - 1732433678943338907
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The study reports that 5 out of 21 subjects (24%) vaccinated with BNT162b2 had an immune reaction to the defective +1 shifted Spike protein (Fig 2d). This shows that a relevant number of persons are affected. No investigation into specific side effects was done. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06800-3

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-07 14:59:59 UTC
(1701961199147)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-12-08 03:04:43 UTC
(1702004683234)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-07 18:00:38 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 13:37:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 12:02:01 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 10:17:20 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 09:08:10 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-08 06:35:10 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-08 05:21:01 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 05:16:09 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 12:30:37 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-10 10:56:18 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-09 19:45:54 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-12 01:59:00 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-18 10:47:05 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-31 15:06:28 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-02 17:20:13 -0600 Rating Details