Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-07 04:02:47 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

While the Gaza Strip is certainly a densely populated area, it does not even crack the top 100 most densely populated areas or cities in the world. https://idsf.org.il/en/opinion-en/gaza-densest-populated-place/#:~:text=While%20the%20Gaza%20Strip%20is,area%20of%20a%20given%20territory.

Written by 2E6E5B2EFEA102682C5FE3FE39B13462F76B7656BC3E822FA77F525A98016C5B
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1732470860022509874

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1732611585934586012
  • noteId - 1732611585934586012
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 2E6E5B2EFEA102682C5FE3FE39B13462F76B7656BC3E822FA77F525A98016C5B Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1701921767109
  • tweetId - 1732470860022509874
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • While the Gaza Strip is certainly a densely populated area, it does not even crack the top 100 most densely populated areas or cities in the world. https://idsf.org.il/en/opinion-en/gaza-densest-populated-place/#:~:text=While%20the%20Gaza%20Strip%20is,area%20of%20a%20given%20territory.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-07 04:02:47 UTC
(1701921767109)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-12-08 03:04:43 UTC
(1702004683234)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-07 16:36:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 14:31:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 10:36:45 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 10:16:13 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 08:33:25 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 07:53:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 05:56:39 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 03:52:07 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 03:21:37 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 02:46:14 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 02:24:49 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 00:19:07 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-06 23:37:38 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-06 23:26:28 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-06 22:54:56 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-06 22:49:37 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-06 22:30:16 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-06 22:22:24 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-06 22:21:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-06 22:08:01 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-06 22:07:23 -0600 Rating Details