Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-06 16:36:38 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

It was a rhetorical question, NNN

Written by 56174FCE764F742DFA1FF068B8D5106DD6BE2F928370F93AD5B4EB5494391F61
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1732376440186822985

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1732438911673123163
  • noteId - 1732438911673123163
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 56174FCE764F742DFA1FF068B8D5106DD6BE2F928370F93AD5B4EB5494391F61 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1701880598361
  • tweetId - 1732376440186822985
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • It was a rhetorical question, NNN

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-06 16:36:38 UTC
(1701880598361)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-12-07 04:50:02 UTC
(1701924602413)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-06 11:24:14 -0600 Rating Details