Birdwatch Note
2023-12-06 16:36:38 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
It was a rhetorical question, NNN
Written by 56174FCE764F742DFA1FF068B8D5106DD6BE2F928370F93AD5B4EB5494391F61
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1732376440186822985
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1732438911673123163
- noteId - 1732438911673123163
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 56174FCE764F742DFA1FF068B8D5106DD6BE2F928370F93AD5B4EB5494391F61 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1701880598361
- tweetId - 1732376440186822985
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- It was a rhetorical question, NNN
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-12-06 16:36:38 UTC (1701880598361) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-07 04:50:02 UTC (1701924602413) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-12-06 11:24:14 -0600 | Rating Details |