Birdwatch Note
2023-12-06 08:15:35 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Aunque es correcto que Madrid supera la media, varias comunidades obtuvieron mejores resultados. Por orden los mejores resultados fueron obtenidos por: Castilla y León, Asturias y Cantabria. Quedando Madrid en un 4 puesto. https://www.abc.es/sociedad/comunidades-autonomas-mejores-peores-notas-informe-pisa-20231205134556-nt_amp.html
Written by D68E0D1CE362FD6726B98CF97C56E556D8652A2B81E9718576BBBC58F3479A78
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1732023739770953746
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1732312819217949082
- noteId - 1732312819217949082
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D68E0D1CE362FD6726B98CF97C56E556D8652A2B81E9718576BBBC58F3479A78 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1701850535578
- tweetId - 1732023739770953746
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Aunque es correcto que Madrid supera la media, varias comunidades obtuvieron mejores resultados. Por orden los mejores resultados fueron obtenidos por: Castilla y León, Asturias y Cantabria. Quedando Madrid en un 4 puesto. https://www.abc.es/sociedad/comunidades-autonomas-mejores-peores-notas-informe-pisa-20231205134556-nt_amp.html
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-06 08:15:35 UTC (1701850535578) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-07 04:50:02 UTC (1701924602413) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-12-06 09:42:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-06 07:51:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-06 07:19:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-06 06:40:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-06 05:51:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-06 05:34:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-06 05:14:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-06 05:02:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-06 04:56:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-06 04:43:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-06 04:41:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-06 04:25:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-06 04:12:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-06 03:50:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-06 03:39:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-06 03:38:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-06 02:45:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-06 02:32:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-07 09:12:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-07 08:48:49 -0600 | Rating Details |