Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-06 04:07:05 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Der sog. Hodenring ist keine anerkannte Verhütungsmethode. Bisher gibt es noch keine wirklich aussagekräftige Studie, die Aufschluss über die Wirksamkeit und die möglichen Nebenwirkungen dieser Methode liefert: https://www.zeit.de/kultur/2023-02/verhuetung-maenner-waerme-forschung

Written by 61D75620741AD3FD79CCA959A7AF51AF5B0D323A07B2E104DA2300417B568ABF
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1732109403837362338

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1732250283290268061
  • noteId - 1732250283290268061
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 61D75620741AD3FD79CCA959A7AF51AF5B0D323A07B2E104DA2300417B568ABF Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1701835625845
  • tweetId - 1732109403837362338
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Der sog. Hodenring ist keine anerkannte Verhütungsmethode. Bisher gibt es noch keine wirklich aussagekräftige Studie, die Aufschluss über die Wirksamkeit und die möglichen Nebenwirkungen dieser Methode liefert: https://www.zeit.de/kultur/2023-02/verhuetung-maenner-waerme-forschung

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-06 04:07:05 UTC
(1701835625845)
2023-12-07 00:13:25 UTC
(1701908005260)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-12-07 04:50:02 UTC
(1701924602413)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-12-07 00:13:25 UTC
(1701908005260)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-06 11:57:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-06 11:35:51 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-06 08:01:46 -0600 Rating Details