Birdwatch Note
2023-12-06 00:50:34 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN There’s not much point in adding an information that’s already in the article itself, unless it contradicts the information in the original post. If someone wants to discuss certain aspects they can do so in the replies, not in a CN.
Written by 5C9C5136CAE1B5A4653494F2961CB43FDA39A8D0EBEEE7A1A7C99239A828A578
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1732132234646200821
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1732200825362026796
- noteId - 1732200825362026796
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5C9C5136CAE1B5A4653494F2961CB43FDA39A8D0EBEEE7A1A7C99239A828A578 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1701823834152
- tweetId - 1732132234646200821
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN There’s not much point in adding an information that’s already in the article itself, unless it contradicts the information in the original post. If someone wants to discuss certain aspects they can do so in the replies, not in a CN.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-12-06 00:50:34 UTC (1701823834152) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-06 03:52:39 UTC (1701834759224) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-12-06 01:46:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-06 00:48:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-05 23:27:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-05 22:57:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-05 19:02:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-05 18:52:54 -0600 | Rating Details |