Birdwatch Note
2023-12-05 06:40:41 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Writing for a singer is not note worthy or even relevant. https://t.co/qGQURBNalC
Written by C9FA679A7617C4B87A023F786C2354E6D21F0D8A7F63928486BF2A6A73A9C1A5
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1731839511502442502
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1731926549853503837
- noteId - 1731926549853503837
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C9FA679A7617C4B87A023F786C2354E6D21F0D8A7F63928486BF2A6A73A9C1A5 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1701758441783
- tweetId - 1731839511502442502
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Writing for a singer is not note worthy or even relevant. https://t.co/qGQURBNalC
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-05 06:40:41 UTC (1701758441783) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-06 03:52:39 UTC (1701834759224) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |