Birdwatch Note
2023-12-04 23:07:09 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The spending commitment is not £20bn. The value quoted here is based on a speculative assessment, rather than an exact cost. Others predict lower, such as £10bn (FT) and £8bn (Times). https://www.infectedbloodinquiry.org.uk/sites/default/files/2023-08-08%20Oral%20evidence%2024-28%20Jul%20%20copy/2023-08-08%20Oral%20evidence%2024-28%20Jul%20%20copy/RLIT0002136%20-%20Journal%20Article%20Sunday%20Telegraph%20Payouts%20for%20infected%20blood%20scandal%20could%20reach%2020bn%20-%2002%20Jul%202023.pdf https://www.ft.com/content/111e2d61-4bab-4be9-a896-a35e1eb2e6d9 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-67607031 https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how-much-compensation-should-contaminated-blood-victims-get/
Written by 29AEE6EA386CFA2A3A88707BF6DAA0F15C95BA0EC0D0714EDD3719375BE16BF3
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1731793683404423530
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1731812414281097722
- noteId - 1731812414281097722
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 29AEE6EA386CFA2A3A88707BF6DAA0F15C95BA0EC0D0714EDD3719375BE16BF3 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1701731229742
- tweetId - 1731793683404423530
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The spending commitment is not £20bn. The value quoted here is based on a speculative assessment, rather than an exact cost. Others predict lower, such as £10bn (FT) and £8bn (Times). https://www.infectedbloodinquiry.org.uk/sites/default/files/2023-08-08%20Oral%20evidence%2024-28%20Jul%20%20copy/2023-08-08%20Oral%20evidence%2024-28%20Jul%20%20copy/RLIT0002136%20-%20Journal%20Article%20Sunday%20Telegraph%20Payouts%20for%20infected%20blood%20scandal%20could%20reach%2020bn%20-%2002%20Jul%202023.pdf https://www.ft.com/content/111e2d61-4bab-4be9-a896-a35e1eb2e6d9 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-67607031 https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how-much-compensation-should-contaminated-blood-victims-get/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-04 23:07:09 UTC (1701731229742) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-05 03:33:02 UTC (1701747182239) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-12-04 18:29:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-04 17:47:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-04 17:12:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-05 10:42:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-05 04:03:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-05 01:56:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-05 01:50:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-05 01:02:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-04 20:41:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-05 05:04:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-04 17:37:19 -0600 | Rating Details |