Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-04 20:45:34 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. 1. the USCRN has a widely known warm bias from bad siting on weather stations. http://www.surfacestations.com/ 2. USCRN reference network cited (all well sited) shows no warming https://wattsupwiththat.com/u-s-surface-temperature/ USCRN-R vs UCRN is a valid field for debate and that should be comments, not notes.

Written by E92B2A33DC6BED1450926FF6DB5AD4F194AD31F63AB2A0A104EEB7EF7D0F7C54
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1718596370724962573

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1731776784457187575
  • noteId - 1731776784457187575
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - E92B2A33DC6BED1450926FF6DB5AD4F194AD31F63AB2A0A104EEB7EF7D0F7C54 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1701722734930
  • tweetId - 1718596370724962573
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN. 1. the USCRN has a widely known warm bias from bad siting on weather stations. http://www.surfacestations.com/ 2. USCRN reference network cited (all well sited) shows no warming https://wattsupwiththat.com/u-s-surface-temperature/ USCRN-R vs UCRN is a valid field for debate and that should be comments, not notes.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-04 20:45:34 UTC
(1701722734930)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-12-05 03:33:02 UTC
(1701747182239)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-04 15:14:23 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-09 06:06:36 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-07 19:00:35 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-16 12:59:48 -0500 Rating Details
2024-03-12 09:58:43 -0500 Rating Details
2024-03-26 12:52:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-03-31 08:26:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-28 07:59:04 -0500 Rating Details