Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-04 17:16:37 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

"Heizen mit Holz ist entgegen der weit verbreiteten Meinung nicht klimaneutral. Pro produzierter Wärmeeinheit sind die CO2-Emissionen sogar höher als bei fossilen Energieträgern wie Kohle oder Gas." Q: https://www.bmuv.de/heizen-mit-holz/umwelt/klimaauswirkungen-von-heizen-mit-holz

Written by 0B5923ABEEE80C1CC54A6A91A5FE790C33DCBFA28CDE58C07195166BFFD113CC
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1731690383896097191

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1731724199138308473
  • noteId - 1731724199138308473
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 0B5923ABEEE80C1CC54A6A91A5FE790C33DCBFA28CDE58C07195166BFFD113CC Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1701710197610
  • tweetId - 1731690383896097191
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • "Heizen mit Holz ist entgegen der weit verbreiteten Meinung nicht klimaneutral. Pro produzierter Wärmeeinheit sind die CO2-Emissionen sogar höher als bei fossilen Energieträgern wie Kohle oder Gas." Q: https://www.bmuv.de/heizen-mit-holz/umwelt/klimaauswirkungen-von-heizen-mit-holz

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-04 17:16:37 UTC
(1701710197610)
2023-12-04 21:24:10 UTC
(1701725050088)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-12-05 03:33:02 UTC
(1701747182239)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-12-04 21:24:10 UTC
(1701725050088)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-04 15:58:37 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 14:55:16 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 14:49:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 14:24:55 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 13:20:46 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 12:05:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 12:03:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 11:39:56 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 11:25:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 11:21:44 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-05 07:39:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-05 03:42:57 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-05 01:06:17 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 19:48:10 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-05 08:40:25 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-05 07:15:37 -0600 Rating Details