Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-04 16:26:40 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Le post est trompeur. La SNCF propose bien 50€ de prime journalière pour les agents travaillant directement pour les J.O qui dure 45 jours. Cependant aucun ne agent ne peut travailler 45 jours d’affilé sans jours de repos. Impossible d’atteindre 2250€ brut. https://t.co/YRlqF3Ll1K

Written by BD78B9A8497D59658DA4BB926B60BBFEFCE41B665E4C83AC1EFDBB96628B2222
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1731200341448818898

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1731711626686910680
  • noteId - 1731711626686910680
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - BD78B9A8497D59658DA4BB926B60BBFEFCE41B665E4C83AC1EFDBB96628B2222 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1701707200105
  • tweetId - 1731200341448818898
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Le post est trompeur. La SNCF propose bien 50€ de prime journalière pour les agents travaillant directement pour les J.O qui dure 45 jours. Cependant aucun ne agent ne peut travailler 45 jours d’affilé sans jours de repos. Impossible d’atteindre 2250€ brut. https://t.co/YRlqF3Ll1K

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-04 16:26:40 UTC
(1701707200105)
2023-12-04 23:12:31 UTC
(1701731551889)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-12-05 03:33:02 UTC
(1701747182239)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-12-04 23:12:31 UTC
(1701731551889)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-04 16:37:45 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 15:09:47 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 14:55:55 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 14:40:11 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 14:36:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 14:20:57 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 14:11:03 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 13:27:03 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 12:18:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 10:29:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-05 01:46:00 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 22:51:49 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 20:07:10 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 22:21:21 -0600 Rating Details