Birdwatch Note
2023-12-04 04:27:36 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - no note needed, this is an opinion https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/opinion
Written by 60896BC94ABA558912E612A9C5B33271C94299E5D261FA41B045721BB78A3145
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1731264295223361963
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1731530669959033221
- noteId - 1731530669959033221
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 60896BC94ABA558912E612A9C5B33271C94299E5D261FA41B045721BB78A3145 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1701664056659
- tweetId - 1731264295223361963
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN - no note needed, this is an opinion https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/opinion
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-04 04:27:36 UTC (1701664056659) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-05 03:33:02 UTC (1701747182239) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-12-04 03:35:35 -0600 | Rating Details |