Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-03 22:14:25 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

NNN Neither Tweet nor the source included claim or imply that covid vaccines were banned in Iceland. You could say that peoples.tv isn't a reliable source and that the information is biased, BUT, at no time there was a claim about vaccines being banned as the note above expresses.

Written by 2F5C2D0F939FA3F217FE96B68DBEABF1AD15672F3775D53F31F79B8005A73E14
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1731382736428872188

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1731436756321378787
  • noteId - 1731436756321378787
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 2F5C2D0F939FA3F217FE96B68DBEABF1AD15672F3775D53F31F79B8005A73E14 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1701641665905
  • tweetId - 1731382736428872188
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN Neither Tweet nor the source included claim or imply that covid vaccines were banned in Iceland. You could say that peoples.tv isn't a reliable source and that the information is biased, BUT, at no time there was a claim about vaccines being banned as the note above expresses.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-03 22:14:25 UTC
(1701641665905)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-12-05 03:33:02 UTC
(1701747182239)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-03 16:41:58 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-03 16:29:34 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-03 16:25:29 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 14:38:13 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 14:24:33 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 10:09:26 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 09:24:29 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 07:53:08 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 06:42:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-03 21:24:40 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-03 20:28:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-03 20:26:53 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-03 18:33:56 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-03 16:35:29 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-03 16:32:52 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-03 16:31:38 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-03 16:30:36 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-03 16:18:15 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-04 02:12:25 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-03 20:58:14 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-03 17:16:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-06 22:06:33 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-25 22:59:41 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-19 00:49:23 -0600 Rating Details