Birdwatch Note
2023-12-02 23:11:34 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Es waren wohl Mehrfachantworten möglich, wodurch man auf mehr als 100 % kommen konnte.
Written by 1BD68677077958DADDF43439975C11166AFAD8B1943A0ACD2BF3A2AC9DA45A00
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1729872319668179374
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1731088749306490946
- noteId - 1731088749306490946
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 1BD68677077958DADDF43439975C11166AFAD8B1943A0ACD2BF3A2AC9DA45A00 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1701558694566
- tweetId - 1729872319668179374
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Es waren wohl Mehrfachantworten möglich, wodurch man auf mehr als 100 % kommen konnte.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-02 23:11:34 UTC (1701558694566) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-03 04:27:56 UTC (1701577676238) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-12-03 18:46:49 -0600 | Rating Details |