Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-02 06:19:00 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. Proposed note's own sources prove the note wrong: https://research.com/u/peter-a-mccullough 775 publications https://research.com/u/milton-packer 637 publications Why the Note's Author decided to confuse citations with publications is anyone's guess, but the note is categorically false (while claiming the tweet is "False & Misleading" to boot).

Written by 5211937BF023BFB5D703D0EC2E926318ACA77B3288D545F4BCF1E62BC3009CE4
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1730783676445622776

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1730833929891135583
  • noteId - 1730833929891135583
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 5211937BF023BFB5D703D0EC2E926318ACA77B3288D545F4BCF1E62BC3009CE4 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1701497940880
  • tweetId - 1730783676445622776
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN. Proposed note's own sources prove the note wrong: https://research.com/u/peter-a-mccullough 775 publications https://research.com/u/milton-packer 637 publications Why the Note's Author decided to confuse citations with publications is anyone's guess, but the note is categorically false (while claiming the tweet is "False & Misleading" to boot).

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-02 06:19:00 UTC
(1701497940880)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-12-03 04:27:56 UTC
(1701577676238)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-02 17:06:32 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 15:31:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 12:17:25 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 10:47:15 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 06:29:34 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 04:59:57 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 01:24:28 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-03 11:53:38 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-03 10:38:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 20:18:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-03 11:06:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-03 10:50:33 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-03 10:02:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 18:14:19 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 16:04:41 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 14:37:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 11:31:58 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 11:29:52 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 06:44:24 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 05:24:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 04:33:54 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 03:21:09 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 02:57:40 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 02:06:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-02 02:05:44 -0600 Rating Details
2024-09-02 01:24:06 -0500 Rating Details