Birdwatch Note
2023-12-01 23:16:24 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Apesar do IBGE classificar como negros os pardos, devemos lembrar que pardos possuem brancos em sua árvore genealógica A discussão em torno de negros se dá por uma questão histórica de preconceito e de privilégios: supostamente Dino teria tido privilégios que outros não tiveram
Written by 87DB5BD7200EFA3898A7836C6B2146AAC488609D8A2D1D7F23998F361B205A6D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1730687942752899409
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1730727577889726561
- noteId - 1730727577889726561
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 87DB5BD7200EFA3898A7836C6B2146AAC488609D8A2D1D7F23998F361B205A6D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1701472584590
- tweetId - 1730687942752899409
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Apesar do IBGE classificar como negros os pardos, devemos lembrar que pardos possuem brancos em sua árvore genealógica A discussão em torno de negros se dá por uma questão histórica de preconceito e de privilégios: supostamente Dino teria tido privilégios que outros não tiveram
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-12-01 23:16:24 UTC (1701472584590) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-02 04:36:39 UTC (1701491799670) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-12-01 18:47:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-01 17:48:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-02 06:42:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-02 06:15:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-01 20:18:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-01 20:15:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-01 19:56:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-01 18:49:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-01 18:38:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-01 18:08:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-01 17:37:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-01 17:32:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-03 02:32:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-02 13:10:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-02 10:56:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-02 08:36:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-02 07:00:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-02 06:45:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-02 03:13:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-01 22:19:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-01 19:56:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-01 19:49:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-03 10:35:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-01 17:49:32 -0600 | Rating Details |